Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,614 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although PBR treatments EM 3 and EM 4 induced early somatic embryogenesis by maintaining statistical parity (P > 0.05) of 59.70 and 59.45 days, respectively, the overall effect of days to embryo initiation was highly significant among the PBR treatments (P < 0.001).
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The correlations of reproductive traits of winter wheat in different environments were compared in the figure, from which it can be seen that most of the winter wheat reproductive traits reached the highly significant level (p<0.001).The correlations of S1 stage traits in E1 environment were -0.02-0.67, and the correlations of S2 stage traits in E1 environment were 0.22-0.55; and the correlations of S1 stage traits in E2 environment were 0.37-0.55; and the correlations of S2 stage traits in E3 and E4 environments were 0.37-0.55. correlation was 0.37-0.63 for S1 stage trait in E2 environment and 0.45-0.62 for S2 stage trait in E2 environment; correlation of S1 stage trait in E3 environment was 0.41-0.62 and correlation of S2 stage trait in E4 environment was 0.36-0.62.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results revealed a highly significant difference in genome size between cultivated and wild jujube (U = 22494.0, p < 0.001), with the median genome size of cultivated jujube (3.49 × 10 8 ) being significantly larger than that of wild jujube (3.37 × 10 8 ), and the Common Language Effect Size (CL = 0.355) confirming the practical relevance of this difference.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Type-III ANOVA identified highly significant main effects of grazing (F = 62.67, P < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.68) and fertilization (F = 14.44, P < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.49), with a moderate interaction effect (F = 4.00, P = 0.029, partial η 2 = 0.21; Supplementary Table 1 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The ANOVA results revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) across the genotypes (G) and genotype × year (G × Y) interactions but no significant differences between the two years (Y) ( Table 1 ). 3.3 Resequencing of sweet potato genotype resources and SNP calling Sequencing was performed after constructing a GBS library of the 96 genotypes.
highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of variance and mean trait performance of finger millet genotypes under contrasting moisture regimes Under drought-stressed (ST) conditions, the analysis of variance showed highly significant (P <0.001) differences among progenies (F 1 ) for all assessed traits ( Table 4 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Relative height had a significant effect on OmegaE ( F = 3.26, p = 0.040), and highly significant effects on all other indicators (e.g., for PPFD: F = 88.78, p < 0.001); the other indicators were also highly significant (for example, PPFD: F = 88.75, p < 0.001); however, the interaction effect between the two was highly significant only for PPFD ( F = 10.15, p < 0.001) and PAR ( F = 10.15, p < 0.001) ( Table 4 ).