Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,614 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantP = 1.5 × 10 -590.0× alphaqualifiedgold
These ROS-responsive genes overlapped with 207 ++Fe-induced and 10 ++Fe-suppressed genes, and the degree of overlap between ROS-responsive and ++Fe-inducible genes was highly significant ( P = 1.5 × 10 -59 by Fisher’s exact test), confirming that excess Fe causes oxidative stress in leaves ( Figure 6E ).
highly significantp < 10 -280.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The resulting Manhattan plot ( Figure 5B ) identified several highly significant metabolic hubs: 3.6.1 Stress-induced lipid amide accumulation The tentative lipid amide (m/z 338.33) was the most significant feature ( p < 10 -28 ), showing prominent accumulation in T3 and T4 samples as a marker for biotic stress. 3.6.2 Phenolic partitioning and correlation with lipid derivatives Quantitative analysis showed that Benzoic acid (GC_BA-TMS) levels were significantly higher in T2 compared to all other treatments.
highly significantp < 1e−200.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We observed highly significant ( p < 1e−20) enrichment for the GO biological process (BP) term “translation”, GO molecular function (MF) term “structural constituent of ribosome”, and GO cellular compartment (CC) term “ribosome” among GO terms for differentially downregulated genes in external cortical tissues after 3 months of storage.
highly significantp < 2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Effects of genotypes on pre-harvest aflatoxin contamination of maize Aflatoxin contamination was highly significant among maize genotypes (p < 2e-16) ( Table 15 ), with A2207–4 having the lowest level (1.33 μg/kg) and YANGA-5–2 the highest (7.65 μg/kg), as shown in Table 16 .
highly significantp < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The mean values of the non-invasively measured community-wide parameters obtained by DWCP seem to give a valid representation of the actual plant community as indicated by the highly significant positive relationship between the weighted plant biomass removed from sods and the digital biomass extracted from scans (quadratic polynomial regression, p < 2.2e-16, adjusted R 2 = 0.59, see Additional Figure 3 ), supporting results from scans of plant individuals ( Laxman et al., 2018 ).
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 –160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This difference in the proportion of homologous genes between preferentially sporophyte expressed and all expressed genes was highly significant in both species according to a chi-squared test ( P. patens : χ 2 df = 1 = 206.16, p < 2.2 × 10 –16 ; F. hygrometrica : χ 2 df = 1 = 384.73, p < 2.2 × 10 –16 ).
highly significantP < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
andersonii (tested via independent samples Wilcoxon rank-sum test), while its F is value was also significantly lower ( P < 0.05).Furthermore, verification of Rarefied Allelic Richness (Ar) via the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test revealed a highly significant difference between the two species (chi-squared = 1770.3, df = 1, P < 2.2e-16), confirming that the genetic diversity of B. andersonii is robustly higher than that of B. tianguii even after standardizing sample sizes ( Figure 3 ). 3.3.
highly significantp < 1 × 10 −150.0× alphaqualifiedgold
While there is a highly significant correlation between PC1 for both methods ( R 2 = 0.949, p < 1 × 10 −15 ), later PCs are often not significantly correlated, with the most notable exception being EFD PC2 and PH PC3 ( R 2 = 0.432, p < 1 × 10 −15 ), although several other PCs also show weak correlations.