Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,473 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
On this basis, an independent samples t -test was conducted to compare the differences between the two groups, and p < 0.05 indicated a significant difference (*), p < 0.01 indicated a highly significant difference (**), and p < 0.001 indicated an extremely significant difference (***). 3.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A quantitative analysis of lipid oxidation, using thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARSs), revealed that the OC and OCEL groups exhibited markedly lower values than both the control (CON) and the linseed-only (EL) groups, with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Milk Yield and Composition—Milk microbiology There were highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in milk yield at the farm and animal level and also in the gross composition of milk during the milk collection period ( Table 3 and Figure 4 ).
an increasing trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Results A total of 4388 juvenile European hedgehogs were admitted to 27 wildlife rehabilitation centres in the Czech Republic in the period from 2011 to 2020, with an increasing trend in the number of juveniles admitted per year during the entire period (rSp = 0.9879, p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant increases ( p < 0.001) in oestrus duration in queens in Treatments B, C and E, i.e., 27.1, 24.2 and 19.2 days, respectively, out of a maximum of 30 days, were all increased compared to the pre-treatment mean of 2.9 days and above the generally accepted mean of 7 days (range of 2 to 9 days) [ 18 , 19 ].
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The interactions between tannin type and concentration (T × C) and tannin type and water level (T × W) were both highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all the analyzed variables except for dCP_BP ( p = 0.157), while the interaction between tannin concentrations and water level (C × W) was insignificant in all variables.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Overall average score for the self-rated understanding of the sheep meat industry was 3.63/5 (1 = poor understanding, 5 = very knowledgeable) and the wool industry was 3.58, with a very strong and highly significant correlation between self-rated understanding of both production systems ( r (929) = 0.82, p < 0.001).